Hey Daily Kos, HIllary Clinton is still a War Criminal you Idiots

For anyone that wants to look, the evidence is clear that Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, committed international war crimes against humanity relative to her actions with Libya and Syria.  There is no question she and Obama and those involved with them have broken international law regarding war that has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and the dislocation of millions. 

So the bullshit about Hillary's emails and the Benghazi committee hearings have always been like investigating a serial killer for shoplifting, regardless the political overtones.

Here's evidence of how partisan democrats are just as dangerous as partisan republicans.  The diary explains how the republican led Benghazi committee and the email scandal were political witch-hunts meant to damage Clinton's chances at winning the Presidency in 2016. 

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/10/1430514/-Breaking-Republican-Staffer-On-Benghazi-Committee-Admits-Probe-of-Clinton-Politically-Motivated

The diarist and absolutely none (correction - one, I found one and eight people who recommended his comment, rock on VeganMark) of the few hundred partisan democrats that commented in and recommended the diary seem to recognize the bigger picture which is that Hillary Clinton was instrumental in starting and waging the illegal U.S. led wars in Syria and Libya and is therefore a war criminal.  She should be arrested and tried for crimes against humanity, some of the results of which we saw recently with the refugee "crisis" emanating from those countries and others wrecked by the evil U.S. Empire. 

Instead, these partisan democrats are celebrating the fact that Clinton is now "free and clear" from this political persecution from the republicans and can proceed with her quest for the Presidency as a trusted politician.  And they're calling for investigations and republican heads to roll in a stunning display of ignorant hypocritical American imperialist selfishness, with not even the slightest bit or remorse for the Libya and Syria people.

A sample comment shows where they're going with it.

"This is not good for Bernie Sanders and his (15+ / 0-)

Recommended by:

stuhunter2, brooklynbadboy, artebella, Gurnt, cpresley, Mopshell, DerekJack30, Pithy Cherub, bleubell, DEMonrat ankle biter, high uintas, northanger, SaintC, Tommy Aces, OleHippieChick

supporters - particularly on this site - who preach the bullshit that Hillary is untrustworthy....blah freaking blah freaking blah
Also, this, right on the heals of the McCarthy disaster - pretty much innoculates Hillary from ANY Benghazi bullshit and email bullshit
HRC is free and clear
But, as always, I wish Bernie and his supporters good health and happiness and sunshine and many many wonderful moments
Hillary has been vindicated.
Thank you and Good Day!  I said Good Day!

by Johnny Drama on Sat Oct 10, 2015 at 04:00:01 PM PDT" 

It's not the partisan democrats on Daily Kos haven't been told about the nature of the war on Libya.  I remember pointing out the manufactured nature of the "civil war" when it was first playing out over four years ago.  Later I recommended a good book, "Slouching toward Sirte, NATO's War on Libya and Africa" by Maximilian Forte and was told by one of the more prominent members, and a former front pager, that they don't read that "Counterpunch stuff".  A good example of how people tune out what they don't want to hear. 

Hell, I noticed someone posted a diary just last week warning people about the illegality of the Libya war and Clinton's role in that, but according to form it was basically ignored.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/07/1428628/-The-Idiocy-of-Benghazi-and-More-Evidence-that-the-American-People-are-War-Criminals

 

What they also don't realize is there was another side to the overall subterfuge and that came from the Clinton camp.  The Clinton's are long time master politicians and to think they didn't attempt to play this thing to their benefit is naïve. 

 

"Larry Nichols, a former Clinton insider claimed that the email scandal was actually manufactured by the Clinton's and their associates to place Clinton in an underdog position instead of the overwhelming favorite (the anointed one) and to get it out of the way before the Republicans can use it in the General election.   He points out that the email scandal was broken by the NY Times which as he puts it "has never been anything but a PR firm for the Clintons"  He says, "there's no way the NY Times would break a story that could do damage to her." 

"They have used the email scandal to catapult them into the underdog status." 

Think about it.  She started her campaign before Bernie Sanders and immediately became the overwhelmingly favorite to not only become the Democratic nominee but also the President.
Now the news about her so called vindication is being plastered on the front pages of the ruling class media.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/10/politics/benghazi-committee-investigation-political-hillary-clinton-brad-podliska-lawsuit/index.html

 

The timing couldn't be better coming right before the Democratic party debates and when Clinton's slide in the polls seems to have stabilized.  This is no coincidence, the ruling class media and the political establishment work together. 

But it all shouldn't matter because it obfuscates the real truth about Empire, war for the ruling class, the Project for a New American Century, and the illegal and inhumane nature of the U.S. led wars against the people of Syria and Libya. 

 

Another example of how we're all being played by these presidential elections with no real choice except what's served up by our masters. 
 

Hillary Clinton is someone that Bernie Sanders said he admires.  He also admires Obama.  So if Sanders becomes President does anyone think he will seek justice against these war criminals?  Many complained that Obama never went after the war criminals in the Bush administration.  You can see how Sanders would not do such a thing either.  The more I learn about Sanders the more I believe he would be nothing more than the third term of Obama, which has been the third and fourth terms of Bush.  In other words, the same thing only different.

 

As for Hillary Clinton, if she becomes President it will be the second time in a row, and third time out of four, the American people would have elected a documented war criminal for President.  The only exception in the last four elections would be Obama's first term when Obama had not yet committed his war crimes. 

 

That's amazing.  I wonder if future generations will look back and recognize what unbelievable sheeple the American people were during these times.  I hope they do because that might mean we eventually made some progress.