"Despite a United States-led global “war on terror” that has cost $5.9 trillion, killed an estimated 480,000 to 507,000 people and assassinated bin Laden, al-Qaeda has grown and spread since 9/11, expanding from rural Afghanistan into North Africa, East Africa, the Sahel, the Gulf States, the Middle East and Central Asia. In those places, al-Qaeda has developed new political influence – in some areas even supplanting the local government.
Al-Qaeda has recruited an estimated 40,000 fighters since Sept. 11, 2001, when the Osama bin Laden-led extremist group attacked the United States, according to the not-for-profit Council on Foreign Relations."
http://foreignpolicynews.org/2019/07/08/al-qaida-is-stronger-today-than-it-was-on-9-11/
https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/al-qaedas-resurrection
https://www.cfr.org/middle-east-and-north-africa/iran
"But not only have we not gone after Al Qaeda, they are stronger than they were on 9/11." Tulsi Gabbard, CFR Agent https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1156770893386924032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1156770893386924032&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcaucus99percent.com%2Fcontent%2Ftulsi-goes-after-kambamas-health-care-plan-so-kambama-attacks-byedone
Take a look at that statement from Gabbard. That is the exact message very recently put out by the CFR which has now made the rounds nationally and into the presidential debates. It's the same propaganda that has been periodically trotted out to serve the agenda of the Zionists/neocons and imperialists. We've been hearing how Al Qaeda is almost defeated, that they're stronger, that they're ISIS, that they're this and that and now that they're stronger than EVER! That's the message Tulsi Gabbard, CFR agent, is bringing to the masses mixed with some bullshit about no more regime change wars.
They, including Gabbard, have the utter gall and temerity to say and want us to believe that almost 18 years after the start of the neverending Global War OF Terror, the enemy is stronger than ever. That is pure bullshit and so is Gabbard.
That's classic misdirection from the ruling class. I had one Gabbard fan tell me that "at least she's talking about foreign policy, we should be happy for that". Of course, that's what they, our rulers, want. For us to be happy that they have one of their oligarchy controlled politicians talking about what some of the citizens want to talk about. That is all part of the propaganda techniques they've used on serfs/peasants/citizens forever.
They can easily allow discussion regarding no more regime change wars because they've already done most of what they wanted done and a reemphasis on the war OF terror is needed at this point. And Trump campaigned on it so the cat is way out of the bag. The entire country is engulfed in a terror security blanket and declaring the war OF terror over would remove the primary excuse for the fascist police state. Gabbard is the perfect person to carry that message and the progressives, like they did with Obama, are falling for it again.
Here's a good example. This is the full paragraph from Gabbard.
"We were all lied to. We were told that Saddam had WMD, was working w/ Al Qaeda & that this posed a threat to the American people. But not only have we not gone after Al Qaeda, they are stronger than they were on 9/11." Most people will focus on the truth she's telling about Iraq. Big deal, is there anyone that doesn't know about Iraq? The truth is out there, better for the elites to just run with it, make it an accepted meme no one can do a damn thing about anyway. That's how she gets her supposed "antiwar" label, stating what are obvious facts already in the mainstream. But then most seem to gloss over the next sentence about Al Qaeda getting stronger than they were on 9/11. What are people thinking, particularly those on the left supporting Gabbard because her statements against regime change, when she says that? Are they accepting it for fact? Are they forgetting that Al Qaeda is a U.S. and company construct that is used as an enemy to justify global imperialism and the remaking of the middle east? Are they excusing Gabbard from this obvious full support for the current CFR directed propaganda concerning this FAKE war on terror? These same people have railed against the war on terror for years and yet they want to support someone who calls herself a "HAWK for the war on terror"?
No comments:
Post a Comment